Senator Nwoko Challenges Regina Daniels’ Sobriety Claims Amid Legal Row

The public dispute between Senator Ned Nwoko and his estranged wife, Nollywood star Regina Daniels, has escalated following the senator’s sharp rebuttal to the actress’s recent claims of sobriety. Through a formal communication released by his media team, Nwoko argued that a single negative drug test is insufficient to erase a documented history of substance use. The statement, circulated on social media, marks a deepening rift in a high-profile separation that has increasingly moved from the private sphere into the courtroom.

Nwoko’s representatives clarified that the senator does not view a solitary test result as a definitive indicator of long-term recovery. The statement emphasized that genuine rehabilitation is a rigorous process involving sustained professional support and honesty, rather than a “snapshot” moment designed for public relations. According to the senator’s team, the actress’s attempt to use a recent negative result to invalidate prior medical findings is fundamentally misleading to the public.

The core of the senator’s argument rests on previous medical reports compiled by independent health centers in both Nigeria and South Africa. These facilities reportedly documented instances of drug and alcohol use during the course of the marriage. Nwoko’s team has signaled its intention to bring these findings before a judge, noting that representatives from these laboratories are prepared to testify and defend the accuracy of their original assessments in a court of law.

Questions were also raised regarding the transparency of the testing process Daniels recently shared. The senator’s team pointed out that a test taken at a time and place of one’s own choosing lacks the scientific weight of independent, surprise, or professionally supervised assessments. They argued that such a result might only indicate “temporary abstinence” rather than a true, permanent break from substance dependency.

The statement took a particularly firm tone regarding the use of MDMA, frequently referred to as “Molly.” Nwoko’s team criticized any attempts to downplay the severity of such substances through casual language or renaming. They maintained that the underlying issues causing friction in the relationship remain unresolved, despite what they characterized as a superficial change in behavior intended for social media consumption.

This latest development follows a previous legal victory for the senator, in which a court dismissed various human rights claims filed by Daniels last year. Nwoko’s camp reiterated that the senator had originally sought to handle these sensitive matters privately. His intention, they claimed, was to allow the actress the space to seek professional help quietly while ensuring she maintained a healthy and meaningful relationship with their children.

The rhetoric from the senator’s office suggests a move away from “social media drama” toward a focus on admissible evidence. By insisting that medical reality cannot be altered by a single post or a curated image, Nwoko is positioning the conflict as a matter of public record and judicial scrutiny. His team stressed that the gravity of the situation requires credible, long-term proof rather than temporary gestures.

As the legal proceedings loom, the case highlights the intersection of celebrity culture, private health struggles, and the complexities of Nigerian family law. The senator’s refusal to accept the actress’s denial indicates that the battle for custody and reputation will likely center on these disputed medical records. For now, the focus remains on the upcoming court dates where the laboratories involved are expected to provide the “reality” Nwoko’s team insists is missing from the public narrative.